Welcome back everyone!
In the first article, we dug into the biggest alleged pandemic of our time- The Spanish Flu- and detailed Rosenau’s transmission studies that demonstrated the inability to pass on the deadliest ‘virus’ in American history. I think it would be appropriate to now go back a bit further and lay out what is considered the foundational evidence, taking a very important look at the man known as the Father of the Germ Theory himself: Louis Pasteur.
Pasteur has become somewhat of a household name, from the pasteurized milk that is purchased at the grocery store… to the heralded rabies vaccines many inject their dogs with… right on down to the curriculum our children and healthcare workers are all learning about in their respective schools. Actually, much of modern medicine stems from his fraudulent and unethical work, which is why I believe that it is of significant importance that people know and understand this historic information, as it is essential for understanding how we have become so entrenched in the idea that scary germs spread around and cause illness amongst groups of people.
It is important because this is one of those things where once you see the con for what it is, you can’t unsee it. It will change how you look at health and medicine in a way that enables you to really take your life and your health back. Once you can see through the facade and the control mechanisms that were put in place it really begins to make sense. The effort to keep us all stupid and sick and unwise is a big one, so history of this nature is important, because knowing history and what took place helps to aid in making better choices for ourselves and our families going forward.
We begin first with his father, Jean-Joseph Pasteur, who was a tanner by trade. who-Not just any tanner, of course, but one who supplied leather to Napoleon I’s Imperial Guard. His father also served on the staff of Marshal Davout- Napoleon’s famed “Iron Marshal”- and later in the advisory circle of Napoleon III. The family’s prosperity allowed the young Louis Pasteur to attend the Besançon Royal College, where his tuition was underwritten by the Prefect’s office, itself stocked with Bonapartists. These connections helped to secure Pasteur important funds for his research, personally approved by the Jewish Minister of Finance, Achille Fould—himself of the Fould banking dynasty, intermarried with the Rothschilds of Paris. LOL, very convenient… So this royal sponsorship—plus Rothschild-linked banking houses—funneled him unlimited lab budgets and media amplification.
We later see the same Rothschild Frères, Banque de Paris et des Pays-Bas, and the Pereire brothers- all Jewish financiers- back The Pasteur Institute in it’s early days. The quid pro quo? A medical model that would justify future vaccine mandates, big pharma coal tar products, and patent monopolies. (Fast-forward to 1910 in America: Rockefeller’s Flexner Report simply copied the French script- starve dissenting schools and institutions of their funds, dump money into the ones who are promoting the narrative, and then crown Germ-Theory orthodoxy as king. I will discuss this at length in another article.)
It it important to point out that while Pasteur was being placed on this golden pedestal, other relevant scientists had their work stifled and ignored in his favor. The most glaring example is what happened to Antoine Bechamp, who had his research first ridiculed and then plagiarized by Pasteur. This is actually a pretty lengthy subject that I won’t spend too much time on, as I could honestly create an entire second series just on the Bechamp vs Pasteur argument. While I always recommend that anyone reading this article does their own dive into this subject and does their own research, I will just highlight a few key points from this feud in particular that will add some context and clarity here.
French Silkworm Studies: Back when this was all taking place, France’s silk industry was collapsing due illness in the silkworms. From the onset, Pasteur applied his Germ Theory tactics, purporting that the presence of a single protozoan microbe was the cause of the illness. This, despite Bechamp showing that the silkworms were actually suffering from a multitude of conditions, including poor nutrition, digestive issues, and poor breeding conditions. Pasteur’s myopic focus on a single microbe did nothing to address the broader health collapse of the silkworms. When the silkworm industry eventually recovered, Pasteur was hailed as a hero. However, he had nothing to do with it. The farmers were importing better egg stock from other countries, breeding and feeding conditions had improved, and the surviving silkworms were hardier.
Work Suppression & Plagiarism: Pasteur was a member of the Academy of Sciences, which published the scientific journal Comptes Rendus. Pasteur’s allies on the editorial boards refused to publish Bechamp’s rebuttals in the journal, a classic example of work suppression and narrative control. Longtime readers will be quite familiar with my disdain for the peer review/ medical journal regime, and clearly the scams and suppression go back pretty far.
Confronting the Lies: Bechamp had actually publicly challenged Pasteur over his lies on more than one occasion, most notably at the International Medical congress held in London in 1881. In front of a room full of their contemporaries, Pasteur took credit for Bechamp’s work and stated Bechamp was pretty much only riding on his coattails. Infuriated, Bechamp then openly stated that Pasteur was defrauding him and co-opting his work, and demanded that Pasteur cough up the evidence. Instead of properly addressing Bechamp, Pasteur instead decided to take leave of the session entirely to avoid confrontation and to save face. Pretty cowardly if you ask me.
We see here just in the feud between these two men that something just isn’t right. I mean, honestly, would we need fantastic propaganda like this to bolster Pasteur if he was legit?
But Bechamp was not the only terrain theorist Pasteur battled with, I just really feel that he got screwed the most by Pasteur and the French establishment. Another pretty well-known fact on the rivalry between the conflicting Germ vs Terrain theories lies with the infamous last words that Pasteur echoed on his deathbed. He referred to another terrain theorist proponent of that time, Claude Bernard. In his final hours, Pasteur was reported to have admitted his shortcomings to a hospital physician, stating that “Bernard was right, that the germ was nothing and the terrain was everything.” Now, many will argue that this was just the fever-dream mutterings from a man on his deathbed, but let’s not discount these words so dismissively. There is a reason that deathbed confessions are not taken lightly, as this is a time where someone knows they are at the end of the road… in plain terms, they have no reason for hiding anything. It would not be likely in Pasteur’s final hours to make this stunning admission, which contradicts his entire life’s work, if it were not something he felt he needed to release before passing on.
WHY IS THIS SO IMPORTANT?
The weight of this information means that Pasteur admits that his entire germ paradigm- which gave rise to a trillion-dollar industry focused on vaccines and antibiotics instead of holistic health- was fundamentally misplaced. It may seem like this stuff is just old news and we are far removed from it, but you have to address the foundation… if it is built poorly, the entire house comes crashing down. That is the point. I feel that this information itself is more than enough, yet I am more than aware that surely there will be some immediate knee-jerk responses to this… and naturally so, as the Germ Theory machine was cleverly and powerfully built. So allow me to also address some of the modern criticisms of the day below:
“But what about the rabies vaccine, surely that has been helpful?” Actually, no. Here is what they don’t teach you in school: 50 children and countless dogs were injected with a caustic cocktail of dried spinal cords from allegedly rabid rabbits. The problem was that no rabbit was ever proven rabid! In fact, in Pasteur’s notes, he openly admits “symptoms uncertain.” Worse, mortality in the treated group was higher than in untreated controls. Yes, you read that correctly, yet the imperial press hailed it as a miracle. Today, we blindly give our dogs this and a mash-up of other vaccines based on this deeply flawed experimentation.
“Ok, so his rabies experiments were a tad questionable, so what? Vaccines are still important and they save lives.” This is one of the biggest counter-arguments I come across and it is one that really blows me away when people toss it out there. Let’s think about this for a moment, shall we? First and foremost, accepting the premise “vaccines save lives, so don’t question the foundation” is a Faustian bargain. You trade critical thought, ethical principles, and the pursuit of genuine health for the illusion of safety handed down by an unaccountable expert class. I have just demonstrated for you how deeply flawed and crooked the foundations are when it comes to what many consider the pioneering evidence for this whole thing. Yet somehow, we have become conditioned to agree to never ask how or why or at what cost. That suppressed line of thinking simply will not serve us.
FUN FACT: Did you know that Louis Pasteur credits his diabolical work with rabies to a “chance reading of the Talmud” ??!! Not an antisemitic trope, it is literally documented and bragged about here: https://www.jewishpress.com/sections/features/features-on-jewish-world/louis-pasteur-the-jewish-connection/2020/07/29/
“Well he made milk safer with Pasteurization!” Not quite… what he really did was make it easier to prioritize industrial degradation over natural quality. This process treats raw whole milk as a product that needs sterilizing as opposed to a source of our vitality. The nutritional loss alone isn’t talked about nearly enough, it’s pretty much glossed over. Then, take into account that related illness from drinking milk was not an issue in places that didn’t have their cows living in filth and had good sanitation and later, proper refrigeration. No, sadly all Pasteurization does is heat and kill the beneficial beneficial flora and enzymes that maintain digestive health while preserving the dead, denatured proteins and oxidized fats that your blood has to detoxify. Pasteurization doesn’t make food safe – it makes food fake.
“Pasteur’s journals are old and outdated, why are we beating a dead horse over this? The science has been settled since then.” Precisely this argument is a huge part of the problem. We relegate ourselves to the idea that because time has passed, an issue has no worth in discussing. This is deeply flawed, erroneous thinking. Again, I point out that if the foundation is cracked and flawed, it is only a matter of time before anything built upon it comes to a catastrophic collapse. Additionally, the proverbial horse is anything BUT dead. This argument has been ongoing for over a century, with some very intelligent big brains addressing the issue over time. The problem is that history is typically written by the victors and true dissent over the Germ vs Terrain theory has been massively stifled. (I mean, what do you expect when you threaten a trillion-dollar empire that has cemented it’s legacy over this amount of time?) Science has ABSOLUTELY not been settled in this regard, and scientismos fail to reconcile that their evidence uses nothing but confirmation bias and the piling up of shoddy, failed evidence on top of a shoddy, failed foundation.
To further expand on this particular point, it is pretty concerning that Pasteur worked so hard to conceal said notebooks from the public. We know now that Pasteur had instructed his family to never release his notebooks. It was not until many years later that his last surviving grandson donated the 100+ notebooks to a French library in the 1970’s. From there, they remained heavily restricted until the 1990’s, which is when scholar Gerald Geison published his book The Private Science of Louis Pasteur, detailing the inconsistencies and discrepancies quite well. It is interesting to think that had this information been readily available while Pasteur was still alive, we might have been able to properly address the issues before they became cemented in stone.
I am sure there are other arguments or points that can be discussed here, but I think these serve as enough for this article.
When you take a look at his public vs private science, the plagiarism, and deathbed confession and pair it with the other stuff like financial/elitist backing, the abominable experiments, and the incentive for monetizing the germ theory, the whole thing really just paints its own picture. Hopefully this has all been helpful to anyone who has taken the time to sit and read it all.
Next article: the Flexner Report—how a single elitist-funded memorandum shuttered half of America’s medical colleges, criminalized homeopathy & naturopathy, and welded the U.S. medical guild to Pasteur’s fraudulent germ dogma for the next century. READ HERE.
Additional Reading/Resources:
I highly recommend reading both The Private Science of Louis Pasteur by Gerald Geison as well as Bechamp or Pasteur? A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology by Ethel D. Hume. Both books are excellently written and contain a plethora of source material to go over, much of which I pulled from to write this article. In addition, you can check out the following:
https://www.encyclopedia.com/people/science-and-technology/chemistry-biographies/louis-pasteur
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36852601/
https://www.frenchempire.net/biographies/davout/
https://www.utimes.pitt.edu/archives/
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8283628/
https://digital.sciencehistory.org/works/ht24wj559/viewer/p2676v84n
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Achille_Fould
https://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0038-23532007000500008
