Interview with Anthony Brink of The Perth Group
Virology, Infighting and No Virus INC. Gatekeepers, DNA/ Genetics, and Other Ways We are Kept in the Never-Ending Cycle of Pandemics
Many of my readers will recall that this was first published back in 2024 when DPL and I hosted a fantastic Twitter Space with Anthony Brink, who was on the frontlines of the old AIDS Dissident movement. Anthony continues to advocate for true science and evidence-based research today, and gives an important insight into the REAL David Crowe, how much of the infighting you see today can be likened to what happened to the old dissident movement, and what we should all be looking out for in order to stop this all from happening again before it is too late.
I wanted to re-release this article and add some very important edits. I feel that this is especially important given the nature of discussion between many in the No Virus camp, and I feel that it serves to answer a lot of questions as to why some of us truly question some of the motives involved here. Catch up with the audio above and check out some of the supplementary material below that is relevant to the conversation we had. Thanks again to both DPL and Anthony for a great talk!
You can give Anthony Brink a follow on Twitter HERE
You can also head over to the WEBSITE Anthony mentions in the interview, detailing the timeline of the Rethinking AIDS group and some of the fuckery that involved Duesberg and Rasnick along the way
In the recording, we mention Omar Jordan’s group The Darkside Papers. You can give the group a follow on Telegram HERE
It should be mentioned that DPL, in my opinion, seemed to have been the only one that was really hitting on The Perth Group hard enough. He covers interviews by Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos, Val Turner, has talked with Anthony Brink and Rod Knoll in the past, and covered the 1997 papers in detail… when NO ONE ELSE was talking about them. He has since had to nuke his Substack account, which was a fantastic wealth of knowledge. You can find links to some of his relevant work, including discussions about the 1997 papers, The Gatekeepers Club article, and more below.
For anyone paying attention, it is quite clear why DPL had to be attacked and silenced out of this sphere. He was hitting was too close to home and was way over the target. His work was detrimental to these Controlled Opposition clowns, and this is why they are so threated by guys like him that work to call out the bullshit.
The Gatekeepers Club
Virology- The Damning Evidence
No Virus- A Battle That Started Before Our Time
The History of The Perth Group
During our talk, we discussed the DNA/ Genetics junk science. Here are some resources to help with more research in that area:
There is NO mRNA in the Shots!
No mRNA, no RNA, no DNA... wait what?!
That's right... DNA/ Genetics is yet another junk pseudoscience. Learn more about why I would make such an outrageous claim in this article.
Here is a LINK to Omar Jordan’s fantastic paper on DNA Fingerprinting
We mentioned Stefan Lanka and his Measles court case during the interview… Contrary to what you will find on the internet, he did NOT lose his court case. The case went on to appeals where he was named the victor. Read a bit about that HERE
Thanks for reading!
Since I have taken to blocking Eric Coppolino, and have no clue why he was not already blocked... for anyone else who can still publicly read his ridiculous gripes about Anthony Brink's involvement with the Perth Group, let's be clear:
Brink was actively involved in supporting the Perth Group during the Parenzee case. While he was not a signatory to any specific legal documents in the case (e.g., court submissions), Brink played a significant role in advocating for the Perth Group’s position. He provided both intellectual and moral support, promoting their oxidative stress hypothesis and their challenge to HIV’s existence. Brink’s writings, including articles and books like Debating AZT, aligned closely with the Perth Group’s views, and he publicly criticized David Crowe for undermining their testimony by influencing Parenzee’s lawyer, Kevin Borick, to pivot toward Peter Duesberg’s arguments. While I concede that Brink’s involvement was more ideological and promotional, rather than as a direct participant in court proceedings, there is no denying his role here and to do so is extremely dishonest. Coppolino can go fuck himself in front a mirror.
I'll be driving tomorrow, so will have time to listen to entire podcast.
But in the meantime, would you kindly satisfy my curiosity re David Crowe? Was he a sheister? I used to listen to The Infectious Myth back in the day. I never thought he was a sh%tbag...but I've been fooled before. Yes, I admit it.
He had a soft, baby sounding voice. Maybe that was part of the deception lol