It is their M.O. -> Nelson Mandela is also promoted as a saint but is anything but. It is how they invert reality, think of the recent George Floyd story.
In my opinion, Martin was nothing more than an actor, playing the rol he was given by the people in the eye of the pyramid. Just like JFK, he was not killed in reality, just his character served its purpose and a staged death would serve another purpose.
It's nice to see people waking up at last, although this is only the partial truth exposed. Thanks anyway, Kristin. Keep digging. You have yet to reach the main vein.
May I make a suggestion? I have forgotten his name, but an African man is on the same voyage, but he has more data for navigation. He is writing the truth about Mohandas Gandhi.
Meanwhile, MLKing must be examined conjointly with his twin, The City of London's Mohandas Gandhi.
Gandhi was a racist and back-stabbing treacherous Indian lawyer in South Africa and, later when he was reshaped as the Zionist puppet for peace, black Africans tried to warn Indians. Nobody listened. However, today, an Indian woman, Arundahti Roy, has published her own expose. I will say no more about this as it is better if you go down this bunny hole on your own. Let me nudge you in the right direction just a little bit by outlining the general plot.
Although most of the resistance movement sees the White House and CIA as the principals of repression, those mindless denizens take their orders from the plutocrats above, who in turn are led by the City of London. Thus, dual programmes are not only possible, but can be implemented seamlessly. The 1975 MI6/CIA coup d'etat of Australia was a clear example.
Anyway, Gandhi was resourced and trained to deliver Indian sovereignty the way the City of London wanted it. For some reason it was the FBI, not CIA, that took the same line with King.
The idea was to resolve the outstanding problem of resistance to the introduction of the new world order (aka Greater Israel as outlined by Ben Gurion). The Zionists were well aware that enough people would wake up and hang the lot of them, so a method was devised that eliminated meaningful resistance. This was the new and powerful ethic introduced by Gandhi and King, of "non-violent peaceful protest". The message was validated by the martyrdoms of the two men, and then later Hollywood cannonised them with epic movies. Thus, the entire middle and upper classes were rendered emasculated and could now be safely presumed to march joyfully to the death camps singing of moral victory all the way.
The genius of this approach is that the subscribers firmly believe the ethic emerged from their own superior intellect, having sagely observed the proof of its efficaciousness in India and the US. Disparaged as 'peaceniks' or 'fags' by the working class, who have had their noses rubbed in bullying and counter-violence all their lives, when they eventually realise their children have been mudered by vaccinations, they will cut loose on day one and butcher every politician, bureaucrat, doctor, nurse, and journalist they encounter, and will then burn down the hospitals and universities.
The globalists are on to this and maintain rigid control of the media so that they can control the reaction. This is why media-baron Rupert Murdoch was handed the Zionist dynastic mantle in 1973, which finally draped his shoulders in March 2017. Naturally, Rupert does not want to be assassinated so he plays the role of grumpy old man struggling to contain his own power-hungry children.
Who cares what I think? But I consider that the globalists have miscalculated.
Rather than writing about "Communism" and King's alleged picadilios. Maybe try to take on board the mass slaughter of millions in Asia - by your fellow anti-ccommunists.
This article is one based on truth but not context of the time that Mr. King was a part of. The context has been left off the table. The Malcolm X portion is out of context of the times also. It seems that people just wish to have there bubble of a world just approved. How can MLK and Martin Luther King we discussed in a short article. This is what is called a slant piece. It is one of frustration! MLK as a mortal man is again taken out of context. Most men at that time were philanders. That is nothing special. Also the part of these tapes is not discussed and why the tapes. Why was MLK even a necessary individual? Why did he turn out that way? Was what he was fighting for necessary? Why did he have to fight for these things? It is shameful that this is written on him on his birthday celebration. He is a man first. He is not perfect. Every single man in history may be found to be a philanderer.
I acknowledge the philandering point and how it may be used to excuse his behavior. Bearing willing witness to rape goes beyond that, don’t you think? So does being a Communist infiltrator.
Instead of being vague about context, what context do you think is missing? I don’t think I left out anything significant, but correct me if I am wrong.
Further, if it was all so harmless and his behavior was so common, why have it put it under seal for so long?
the whole communist thing is smoke and mirrors. There was no where else for civil rights folks aka blacks could go at that time. There was no internet which folks now. You must make an attempt to walk someone else's shows especially a critical historic as MLK. The Democrats at the times was the party of KKK. The Republican party was the monied crowd per se. Where was MLK or any other black of stature such as Paul Robeson to go? What political party was there? The behavior is harmful to his family. Also in the 50's ,60's women were always used to get a high profile man. That was regular business. The seal by the government was because the F.B.I tapes could also make the USA government look bad. He didn't do the rape. Yes his comments may have been offensive. However, that is locker room talk. Not agreeing with that behavior. When you write about a dynamic historical figure you must provide context I feel. Everything isn't political. Back then he was under attack by the F.B.I. He was a Christian wasn't he?
He didn’t do the rape… yet the records allege he was in the same room as the victim and rapist and laughed about it all and encouraged it. I don’t know how you can make excuses for the man like this, but ok.
Further, not having internet at the time doesn’t really have much weight as far as things go, I don’t see the relevance of that comment.
You make the case that philanthropy was common… ok, well in current times, declaring yourself a they/them and mutilating your genitals is also common… does that mean I want the face of a political or other movement I am following to be a complete degenerate??
Again you need to research why the holiday was necessary in the first place sir! It is so amazing to me how people just have a axe to grind! Pose the question why the holiday? Why was he assassinated? Look at the 60's. His assassination is connected to RFK's assassination.
That is really sad. It appears that everyone who we were taught was a good person was something else entirely. Just like the founders of the USA were all Freemasons. Not Christians.
Alcoholic Communist Rapist.
It is their M.O. -> Nelson Mandela is also promoted as a saint but is anything but. It is how they invert reality, think of the recent George Floyd story.
In my opinion, Martin was nothing more than an actor, playing the rol he was given by the people in the eye of the pyramid. Just like JFK, he was not killed in reality, just his character served its purpose and a staged death would serve another purpose.
Smoke and mirrors in our LARP reality.
It's nice to see people waking up at last, although this is only the partial truth exposed. Thanks anyway, Kristin. Keep digging. You have yet to reach the main vein.
May I make a suggestion? I have forgotten his name, but an African man is on the same voyage, but he has more data for navigation. He is writing the truth about Mohandas Gandhi.
Meanwhile, MLKing must be examined conjointly with his twin, The City of London's Mohandas Gandhi.
Gandhi was a racist and back-stabbing treacherous Indian lawyer in South Africa and, later when he was reshaped as the Zionist puppet for peace, black Africans tried to warn Indians. Nobody listened. However, today, an Indian woman, Arundahti Roy, has published her own expose. I will say no more about this as it is better if you go down this bunny hole on your own. Let me nudge you in the right direction just a little bit by outlining the general plot.
Although most of the resistance movement sees the White House and CIA as the principals of repression, those mindless denizens take their orders from the plutocrats above, who in turn are led by the City of London. Thus, dual programmes are not only possible, but can be implemented seamlessly. The 1975 MI6/CIA coup d'etat of Australia was a clear example.
Anyway, Gandhi was resourced and trained to deliver Indian sovereignty the way the City of London wanted it. For some reason it was the FBI, not CIA, that took the same line with King.
The idea was to resolve the outstanding problem of resistance to the introduction of the new world order (aka Greater Israel as outlined by Ben Gurion). The Zionists were well aware that enough people would wake up and hang the lot of them, so a method was devised that eliminated meaningful resistance. This was the new and powerful ethic introduced by Gandhi and King, of "non-violent peaceful protest". The message was validated by the martyrdoms of the two men, and then later Hollywood cannonised them with epic movies. Thus, the entire middle and upper classes were rendered emasculated and could now be safely presumed to march joyfully to the death camps singing of moral victory all the way.
The genius of this approach is that the subscribers firmly believe the ethic emerged from their own superior intellect, having sagely observed the proof of its efficaciousness in India and the US. Disparaged as 'peaceniks' or 'fags' by the working class, who have had their noses rubbed in bullying and counter-violence all their lives, when they eventually realise their children have been mudered by vaccinations, they will cut loose on day one and butcher every politician, bureaucrat, doctor, nurse, and journalist they encounter, and will then burn down the hospitals and universities.
The globalists are on to this and maintain rigid control of the media so that they can control the reaction. This is why media-baron Rupert Murdoch was handed the Zionist dynastic mantle in 1973, which finally draped his shoulders in March 2017. Naturally, Rupert does not want to be assassinated so he plays the role of grumpy old man struggling to contain his own power-hungry children.
Who cares what I think? But I consider that the globalists have miscalculated.
For further reading: https://mileswmathis.com/fakir.pdf
Oh my.
We need to talk.
tonyryan43@protonmail.com or substack oziz4oziz
That's interesting Kristen. Why did they kill him?
You tell me
It appears they didn't: https://mileswmathis.com/mlk.pdf
Rather than writing about "Communism" and King's alleged picadilios. Maybe try to take on board the mass slaughter of millions in Asia - by your fellow anti-ccommunists.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRk81CuUKwI
Feel free to write about that one and send it to me!
Something wrong with Communism ?? Oh, "what every good 'Murkin KNOWS" !!
This article is one based on truth but not context of the time that Mr. King was a part of. The context has been left off the table. The Malcolm X portion is out of context of the times also. It seems that people just wish to have there bubble of a world just approved. How can MLK and Martin Luther King we discussed in a short article. This is what is called a slant piece. It is one of frustration! MLK as a mortal man is again taken out of context. Most men at that time were philanders. That is nothing special. Also the part of these tapes is not discussed and why the tapes. Why was MLK even a necessary individual? Why did he turn out that way? Was what he was fighting for necessary? Why did he have to fight for these things? It is shameful that this is written on him on his birthday celebration. He is a man first. He is not perfect. Every single man in history may be found to be a philanderer.
I acknowledge the philandering point and how it may be used to excuse his behavior. Bearing willing witness to rape goes beyond that, don’t you think? So does being a Communist infiltrator.
Instead of being vague about context, what context do you think is missing? I don’t think I left out anything significant, but correct me if I am wrong.
Further, if it was all so harmless and his behavior was so common, why have it put it under seal for so long?
the whole communist thing is smoke and mirrors. There was no where else for civil rights folks aka blacks could go at that time. There was no internet which folks now. You must make an attempt to walk someone else's shows especially a critical historic as MLK. The Democrats at the times was the party of KKK. The Republican party was the monied crowd per se. Where was MLK or any other black of stature such as Paul Robeson to go? What political party was there? The behavior is harmful to his family. Also in the 50's ,60's women were always used to get a high profile man. That was regular business. The seal by the government was because the F.B.I tapes could also make the USA government look bad. He didn't do the rape. Yes his comments may have been offensive. However, that is locker room talk. Not agreeing with that behavior. When you write about a dynamic historical figure you must provide context I feel. Everything isn't political. Back then he was under attack by the F.B.I. He was a Christian wasn't he?
He didn’t do the rape… yet the records allege he was in the same room as the victim and rapist and laughed about it all and encouraged it. I don’t know how you can make excuses for the man like this, but ok.
Further, not having internet at the time doesn’t really have much weight as far as things go, I don’t see the relevance of that comment.
You make the case that philanthropy was common… ok, well in current times, declaring yourself a they/them and mutilating your genitals is also common… does that mean I want the face of a political or other movement I am following to be a complete degenerate??
You can think Ronald Reagan for this damn MLK Day.
Again you need to research why the holiday was necessary in the first place sir! It is so amazing to me how people just have a axe to grind! Pose the question why the holiday? Why was he assassinated? Look at the 60's. His assassination is connected to RFK's assassination.
That is really sad. It appears that everyone who we were taught was a good person was something else entirely. Just like the founders of the USA were all Freemasons. Not Christians.